Comparison

Elasticsearch vs Qdrant

A general search engine with vectors, or a dedicated vector database? A factual comparison of retrieval features, licensing and deployment, and when each one fits your AI search, RAG and agent workloads.

Quick comparison

FeatureElasticsearchQdrant
What it isSearch and analytics engine with lexical, vector and aggregation featuresVector database and vector search engine
LicenseSource available under Elastic License 2.0, SSPL 1.0 or AGPLv3 (your choice)Apache 2.0
DeploymentElastic Cloud Hosted, Elastic Cloud Serverless, self-managed, ECE, ECKSelf-hosted, Qdrant Managed Cloud, Hybrid Cloud, Private Cloud
Lexical searchBM25 with configurable text analysisBM25 and text filtering
Dense vectorsdense_vector field, HNSW, up to 4096 dimsDense vectors; several named vectors per point
Sparse vectorssparse_vector field (e.g. ELSER)Sparse vectors
Hybrid fusionRRF retrieverRRF and DBSF in the Query API, plus multi-stage rescoring
Quantizationint8, int4 and BBQ; float vectors quantized by default in recent versionsScalar, binary and product; originals kept for rescoring
Filtered vector searchFilters inside the kNN clause are applied during searchPayload indexes add filter-aware links to the HNSW graph
ScalingShards and replicasShards, custom shard keys, replication; Raft for cluster state
Analytics & logsAggregations, observability and logsNot the focus

Based on the official Elastic and Qdrant documentation. Features change between versions - check the docs for the release you run.

Vector and hybrid retrieval

Elasticsearch

Vectors sit next to a mature lexical engine. The dense_vector field uses HNSW and, in recent versions, quantizes float vectors by default (int8, int4 or BBQ), sparse_vector holds learned sparse features such as ELSER, and the RRF retriever fuses BM25 and kNN results. Filters placed inside the kNN clause are applied during the vector search, so you still get k matches.

Qdrant

Each point can carry several named dense vectors, sparse vectors and multi-vectors scored with MaxSim, plus a JSON payload. The Query API prefetches from each and fuses with RRF or DBSF, then can rescore with a larger vector or a multi-vector model. Payload indexes extend the HNSW graph with extra links so filtered vector search stays accurate, and a tenant flag on a payload index optimises storage for multitenant data.

Memory, scaling and operations

Both engines quantize vectors to cut memory. Qdrant offers scalar, binary and product quantization, keeps the original vectors alongside, and rescores top candidates with them, with oversampling to trade speed for recall. Originals can live on disk, at the cost of slower rescoring.

Both scale out with shards and replicas. Qdrant adds user-defined shard keys (for example per tenant) and uses Raft to keep cluster topology consistent; changing the shard count of an existing collection (resharding) is available in Qdrant Cloud. Elasticsearch brings a broader operational ecosystem: aggregations, observability and several managed and orchestrated deployment options.

Which should you choose?

Choose Elasticsearch if

  • You already run Elasticsearch and want to add vectors rather than a second system
  • Lexical relevance matters: analyzers, synonyms and BM25 tuning
  • You need aggregations, faceting, analytics or logs alongside search
  • You want the Elastic ecosystem and Elastic Cloud deployment options

Choose Qdrant if

  • Vector retrieval is the core workload for RAG, agents or similarity search
  • You need several embeddings per item (named vectors) or late-interaction multi-vectors
  • Memory is a constraint and you want quantization with rescoring
  • Heavy filtering or multitenancy on top of vector search
  • You want an Apache 2.0 engine you can self-host, or a managed or hybrid cloud

Many teams run both: Elasticsearch for lexical search and analytics, Qdrant for vector retrieval behind RAG and agents. The right answer comes from testing each on your own queries.

Considering a move?

Qdrant's migration tool copies vectors and metadata from Elasticsearch and OpenSearch. We handle the rest: collection and payload design, re-creating filters and ranking, and comparing retrieval quality before and after so the cutover is a measured decision.

Frequently asked questions

What is the main difference between Elasticsearch and Qdrant?

Elasticsearch is a general search and analytics engine that added vector search to a mature lexical engine. Qdrant is built specifically for vector search: it stores dense, sparse and multi-vectors per point with filterable payloads. Elasticsearch covers more ground; Qdrant goes deeper on vector retrieval.

When should you choose Qdrant over Elasticsearch?

Choose Qdrant when vector retrieval is the main workload and you want named vectors, multi-vectors, quantization with rescoring and filter-aware vector indexing in a dedicated engine. Choose Elasticsearch when you also need lexical analyzers, aggregations or logs, or when adding vectors to an existing cluster is simpler.

Can both do hybrid search?

Yes. Elasticsearch combines BM25 and vector results with its RRF retriever. Qdrant combines dense and sparse vectors through prefetches in its Query API, fused with RRF or DBSF, and can rescore candidates in further stages.

Is Qdrant open source?

Yes. Qdrant is licensed under Apache 2.0. Elasticsearch source code is available under your choice of Elastic License 2.0, SSPL 1.0 or AGPLv3.

Can I migrate from Elasticsearch to Qdrant?

Yes. Qdrant provides a migration tool that supports Elasticsearch and OpenSearch as sources. Plan for more than a data copy: filters, ranking and lexical behaviour need to be re-created and retrieval quality compared before cutover.

Not sure which engine fits?

Tell us about your data and queries. We will help you test both on your workload and recommend the right setup.