Comparison

Elasticsearch vs Vespa: A Practical Comparison

Both engines can power hybrid search, RAG and AI agents. They differ in licensing, how you configure and scale them, and how much control you get over ranking. Here is how they compare, based on each project's official documentation.

Quick Comparison

FeatureElasticsearchVespa
LicenseElastic License 2.0, SSPL 1.0 or AGPLv3 (your choice)Apache 2.0
Managed serviceElastic Cloud Hosted and ServerlessVespa Cloud
Self-managedYesYes
Configuration modelIndex mappings and settings via REST APIsApplication package: services.xml plus schemas
Query languageQuery DSL and ES|QLYQL
Hybrid retrievalBM25 + kNN, fused with the RRF retrieverBM25 + nearestNeighbor in one query, fused in rank profiles (e.g. RRF)
Ranking modelQuery scoring, rescoring and learning to rank (GBDT models)Rank profiles with first-, second- and global-phase ranking
Model inferenceInference API with built-in (ELSER, E5) and third-party modelsBuilt-in embedders and ONNX models evaluated during ranking
Multi-vector / token embeddingsNot compared hereMixed tensors and a ColBERT embedder
AggregationsAggregationsGrouping language
Scaling dataShards and replicas you plan per indexBuckets distributed automatically across content nodes
Observability and logsCore use case with the Elastic Stack (Kibana)Not a focus

Ranking & Model Inference

Elasticsearch

Relevance starts with BM25 and query-time boosting. Learning to rank adds a second-stage re-ranker using gradient boosted decision tree models, and the inference API produces embeddings with built-in models such as ELSER and E5 or with third-party services.

Vespa

Ranking is defined in rank profiles inside the schema. A cheap first phase scores every match on the content nodes, a second phase re-ranks the top hits per node, and a global phase re-ranks the merged results in the container, where ONNX models such as cross-encoders run. Built-in embedders run ONNX models too, and a ColBERT embedder stores token-level embeddings for ranking.

Deployment & Scaling

Elasticsearch

Run it on Elastic Cloud Hosted, Elastic Cloud Serverless or your own servers. You plan shards and replicas per index, and the Elastic Stack covers logs, metrics and dashboards alongside search.

Vespa

Run it on Vespa Cloud or self-host it. An application package declares stateless container clusters and stateful content clusters. Vespa manages data distribution itself: add content nodes and it redistributes data, with no manual sharding. Fields stored as attributes can be partially updated in place and are visible to queries and ranking immediately.

Which Should You Choose?

Choose Elasticsearch If:

  • You already run it and relevance is good enough
  • You also need logs, metrics and observability
  • You rely on the Elastic Stack and Kibana
  • BM25 + kNN with RRF covers your ranking needs
  • Your team knows Query DSL well

Choose Vespa If:

  • Ranking quality is the core of your product
  • You want ML models evaluated in multi-phase ranking
  • You need multi-vector or tensor-based ranking
  • Ranking signals change often and must update in place
  • You want an Apache 2.0 engine with a hosted option

Considering Migration?

Moving from Elasticsearch to Vespa is more than copying data. We help you:

  • Decide whether a move is worth it for your workload
  • Map indexes and mappings to Vespa schemas
  • Rewrite queries in YQL and relevance logic as rank profiles
  • Feed, verify and compare results against your current system
  • Size content clusters and plan the cutover

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the main difference between Elasticsearch and Vespa?

Elasticsearch is a broad search and analytics engine with a large ecosystem for search, logs and observability. Vespa is focused on serving search, recommendation and RAG applications where ranking is central: rank profiles run in several phases and can evaluate machine-learned models, including ONNX models, per query.

Is Vespa open source?

Yes. Vespa is released under the Apache 2.0 license and can be self-hosted, or run on Vespa Cloud, its hosted platform. Elasticsearch source code is available under your choice of Elastic License 2.0, SSPL 1.0 or AGPLv3, with Elastic Cloud as the managed option.

Which is better for hybrid search and RAG?

Both handle hybrid lexical and vector retrieval for RAG. Elasticsearch fuses BM25 and kNN results with its RRF retriever. Vespa combines BM25 and nearest neighbor search in one query and fuses or re-ranks them in rank profiles. Vespa gives more control over multi-phase ranking; Elasticsearch is often simpler if you already run it.

When should I choose Vespa over Elasticsearch?

Choose Vespa when ranking quality is the main problem: you need several ranking phases, machine-learned or cross-encoder models at query time, multi-vector representations, or frequent in-place updates to ranking signals. Stay with Elasticsearch when you also need log analytics, rely on the Elastic Stack, or your current relevance is good enough.

How hard is it to migrate from Elasticsearch to Vespa?

Moving the data is straightforward: Vespa documents a path that exports an Elasticsearch index, converts mappings to a schema and feeds the documents. The real work is rewriting queries in YQL, rebuilding relevance logic as rank profiles and validating results against your current system before switching traffic.

Still deciding between them?

Talk to us. We will look at your data, queries and ranking needs and recommend the engine that fits.